Video scenes shots:



Watch the video:
URL: | |
Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![]() |
Natural Selection: A Machine for Making Almost Impossible Things Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 186 seconds
Taken from a lecture by professor Steve Jones called "Why creationism is wrong and evolution is right". http://royalsocie ty.org/event.asp?id= 4140 Related: steve, jones, creationism, evolution, natural, selection, royal, society, wrong, right Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
Thank You + About Me Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 586 seconds
A thank you video for my 1000 subscribers. Related: arguseyes Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
The Importance of a Father Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 344 seconds
Richard Feynman was an American physicist known for his work on Quantum Electrodynamics (Q.E.D.) for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1965. He was known for his eccentric nature and his passion for physics. These clips, where Dr. Feynman talks about his father, were taken from the B.B.C. Horizon program the pleasure of finding things out. Related: richard, feynman, father, dad, fatherhood, importance, feminism, mra, mens, rights, women, parents, day, role, model, learning Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
The Dogma of Feminism Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 564 seconds
A video response to BoundlessEyes's video: http://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=hZJdNK PksR4 Transcript and Sources: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/06/02/the-dogma -of-feminism.aspx I tried to keep it short but a lot has to be said. Related: boundlesseyes, arguseyes, dogma, harriett, harman, david, reimer, feminism, patriarchy, socialization, conditioning, feral, children, nonprofit, activism, feminist, definition, feminazi, leftist, leftism, movement, socialism, collectivism, individualism, women, men, womens, rights, equality, liberty, freedom Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
War and Peace Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 503 seconds
Transcript and sources: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/05/28/war-and-p eace.aspx Music track: Larmes by Silence http://www.jamend o.com/en/album/830 Related: war, peace, north, korea, missile, nukes, nuclear, weapons, death, armistice, treaty, break, atomic, bomb, hiroshima, nagasaki, george, bush, hitler, iran, missiles, fired, south, germany, world Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
Female Bigots Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 588 seconds
Transcript: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/03/24/female-bi gots.aspx Related: feminism, feminazi, womens, rights, mra, laura, bennett, ruth, sunderland, boys, girls, feminist, mens, men, women, female, financial, crisis Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
Men's Rights News - The Pendulum Effect Episode 4 Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 593 seconds
My piece for the pendulum effect podcast #4 Supporting article with links: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/02/19/mens-righ ts-news---the-pendul um-effect-episode-4. aspx Equalism Activism: http://www.equali smactivism.com/ Download the podcast: http://feeds.feed burner.com/~r/ThePen dulumEffect/~5/53867 5411/Pendulum_Effect _Episode4_KenWiebe.m p3 Related: mens, rights, equalism, activism, feminism, womens, fathers, f4j, feminazi, equality, men, women, pendulum, effect, paternity, fraud, dennis, prager, when, woman, isnt, in, the, mood, rape, hudson, crash, flight, 1549, n.o.w, obama, cabinet, kim, gandy, shared, parenting Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
Canon 5D Mark 2 - Take Movies In Any Aperture Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 571 seconds
I thought this would be useful. There are other ways to do it as well: http://www.vimeo. com/2530166 http://www.dvinfo .net/conf/canon-eos- 5d-mk-ii-hd/142667-n ew-way-lock-aperture -ef-lens.html Related: canon, eos, 5d, mark, ii, camera, photography, aperture, movie, mode, hd, set, bokeh, depth, of, field, manually, manual Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
The Hudson Crash - Women and Children First?!? Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 416 seconds
Bullshit. Links and quotes here: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/01/21/the-hudso n-crash---women-and- children-first.aspx Related: hudson, river, plane, crash, flight, 1549, survivors, news, articles, women, and, children, first, chivalry, mens, rights, feminism, jezebel, feminazi, bbc, associated, press, reporting, miracle, god Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
The Pendulum Effect Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 594 seconds
Here is the transcript of this video: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/01/19/the-pendu lum-effect.aspx Here is where you can find the podcast: http://www.equali smactivism.com/?cat= 216 Here is the podcast maker's blog: http://www.equali smactivism.com/ Related: pendulum, effect, mens, rights, feminism, feminazi, womens, mra, civil, movement, blacks, homosexuals, feminist, equal, equalism, oppression, bad, laws Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
Thou Shalt Not Criticise Women Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 552 seconds
The transcript (with links) for this video can be found here: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2009/01/18/thou-shal t-not-criticise-wome n.aspx This is my first piece for the "pendulum effect" podcast which you can download here: http://www.equali smactivism.com/?cat= 216 Related: dennis, prager, feministing, pandagon, pendulum, effect, feminism, marital, rape, sexism, womens, rights, jezebel, marriage, advice, jessica, valenti, ed, brayton, dispatches, from, the, culture, wars Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
A message to all the starry eyed Obama worshippers Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 182 seconds
Taken from the Mike McConnell radio show: http://a1135.g.ak amai.net/f/1135/1822 7/1h/cchannel.downlo ad.akamai.com/18227/ podcast/CINCINNATI-O H/WLW-AM/081105_1_mc connell.mp3 Images from the big picture: http://www.boston .com/bigpicture/2008 /11/the_next_preside nt_of_the_unit.html Used under fair use. Related: barack, obama, election, 2008, win, john, mccain, lose, mike, mcconnell, critique, politics, elections, democrat, america, american Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
![]() |
I get email #1: A rambling critique of feminism part 1 Posted by: ArgusEyes
Video duration: 595 seconds
The original email: http://www.true-e quality.net/archive/ 2008/10/26/i-get-ema il-1-a-rambling-crit ique-of-feminism.asp x Related: zionism, feminism, feminist, women, men, mra, sexism, feminazi, equal, rights, radical, quotes, rape, dworkin, hate, critique, email Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
|
Latest comments made on this video:
By: thirdclass2006. on 28 Oct 09, 14:57:05
Exactly what part of science says that evolution is "pathetically preposterous"? As of yet, it's one of the best supported theories. And by theory, I mean that in the scientific sense; an idea that has been tested and is supported by evidence.
By: Chuichupachichi. on 15 Sep 09, 15:53:47
then its automatically "good science". This is precisely why you guys demonstrate on these YT pages how enormously stupid you truly are. Its because you merely look at what the conclusion is & determine its status depending on whether or not it aligns with your predetermination. Its proved by whats noted in this posting. Your mind has never received any exercise. If sold, your brain would be priced higher than any other in the brain store. Due to the fact that it's never been used
By: Chuichupachichi. on 15 Sep 09, 15:52:34
neither science nor Evo. The fact is that even when nothing but pure science is presented (as from ID scientists) & it refutes Evo, you Evoists simply refuse to recognize any such conclusions. Thus, you fool only yourselves by ridiculously & unreasonably claiming that what was presented was only religion. You make your determination by looking only at the final outcome & if its contrary to your view, then its automatically religion But if you like it, no matter how 4 legged whale stupid it is
By: Chuichupachichi. on 15 Sep 09, 15:49:28
(You are spouting creationist propaganda ?) Ha Ha Ha Ha! By making that statement you just demonstrated the fact that evolutionists do indeed predetermine the ends. It's well known by all that when you say something like "creationist propaganda", you're implying that I was speaking religion. However, it only requires someone who knows how to read to go back through my posts & see that I spoke no religion whatsoever. Except for when a poster inquired about the US Constitution but the Const. is
By: Chuichupachichi. on 15 Sep 09, 09:09:34
the opposing argument may be. What you call "disordered", "far reaching", hyperbolous", "irrational" & even "delusional". Is in fact, simply that I pointed out how this video presents unnatural, intelligence produced nozzles & engineering as proof of natural, non intelligence "natural selection". My saying that, is completely reasonable. In fact, since that is precisely the appropriate, refuting argument to make & you claiming its lunacy, delusional etc. is precisely why Evo is "UNFALSIFIABLE"
By: Chuichupachichi. on 15 Sep 09, 09:08:56
(Lunatics are incapable of recognising themselves as such) Lunacy causes even more than that. Aside from not recognizing your lunacy, its also the reason why you don't recognize how much you're like a Femme-Nazi Isn't this something, Argus' mind works like a Femme-Nazis. Simply because you're set in your predetermined views which are arrived at because they're what you wish for reality to be, is why you automatically reject anything that refutes those views no matter how reasonable & factual
By: ArgusEyes. on 13 Sep 09, 20:14:59
"Except you guys are already as dirty as can be" Is that so? "Next time, when without reason, don't cry" Reason is calling all your opponents "dirty as can be" and "with a rap sheet of fraudulence" apparently.
By: ArgusEyes. on 13 Sep 09, 20:14:47
"This whole farce is claiming to be proof of natural selection's validity" This "farce" is merely an interesting and educational video for normal people. We don't need to prove natural selection's validity, it's settled science. You coming on and throwing a fit is the depressing state of affairs when talking about these subjects.
By: ArgusEyes. on 13 Sep 09, 20:04:30
Lunatics are incapable of recognising themselves as such. "why don't you make an attempt at the much more difficult task of actually presenting a sensible, plausible argument that addresses what I've presented" Your "arguments" are so disordered, so far reaching and hyperbolous and irrational and downright delusional, that there is a point at which one decides that it would take a tome to deal with them. At such a point, "lunatic" becomes an effective argument against such a person.
By: sausage4mash. on 13 Sep 09, 15:49:29
"I don't use religion to make such determinations! " You are spouting creationist propaganda ?
By: Chuichupachichi. on 13 Sep 09, 01:54:29
("Why did Christian God create virus"?) Beats the hell out of me? All I know is how science shows evolutionary theory to be pathetically preposterous I don't use religion to make such determinations!
By: Chuichupachichi. on 13 Sep 09, 01:47:02
now now meat masher mutant, don't forget what your Senior Simianites have recorded into your cavernous cranial cavity. The big evoists in the tree tops have said that since viruses resist antibodies by mutating, that proves macro evolution. Seems I must teach u your own evo theory stupidity. You Primateological Pinheads are the ones that said evolution requires "reproductive" organisms. "Viruses"? "you do not even know what evolution is"? "why should I teach you"? "fucking Idiot"? Ha Ha Ha Ha
By: Chuichupachichi. on 13 Sep 09, 01:28:31
Get the sausage out already.......fool! If you weren't so brainwashed into monkey madness you might have realized that what you replied to with an obvious explosion of frustration, is neither biology nor creationism However, one must recognize that it would be too difficult for a mere compilation of mutational defects to correctly distinguish between biology, creationism & the subject matter of "engineering" & "design" that I was discussing with Argus Next time, when without reason, don't cry
By: sausage4mash. on 09 Sep 09, 21:13:32
this is why computer viruses are named thus, they insert their code in other programs . So why did your christain God create the virus ?
By: sausage4mash. on 09 Sep 09, 21:13:17
"Tell us, why are they still viruses? " A question that clearly demonstrates you do not even know what evolution is , why should I teach you ?! , lol bacterial "viruses" fucking Idiot , a virus has nothing to do with a bacteria ,and you are telling us about Evolution . a virus is unable to reproduce, it gets other organisms ,cells or Bacteria to do the job ,
By: sausage4mash. on 09 Sep 09, 19:14:42
Chuichupachichi for fuck sake ! read a biology book, NOT " answers in genisis . com" or the teachings of convicted fraudster Kent Hovand . End of discussion , ALL this creationist crap has been debunked 1000.s of times over ,its boring now,Religion is NOT science !
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 21:22:07
Remember now, no "pretending" allowed. You can't wear a Christian Isaac Newton mask. Also, since yours is to be a demonstration of what "prodigious scientific proficiency" looks like, is why it can't sound like Dawkin's "STUMPED" & finally delivered, irrelevantly retarded answer. Ridiculously well rounded "reasoning" & luminous "logic" are required of you. As one would expect from a scientifically spectacular "atheist" with ancestral Amoebian forebearers
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 21:21:50
"sauce edge form ash", Since "creationism is Christianity pretending to be science". Then you must certainly be the scientifically astutely literate individual that can tell us more about those 1.5 billion yr old bacteria Perhaps, you're a specialist in bacterial "viruses" in particular? We know how they madly mutate almost continuously. The implausibility of they descending from complex organisms means they've directly descended from the first single cells. Tell us, why are they still viruses?
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 20:53:47
I see..... well your silence simply demonstrates that yours is what's often exhibited by your Simianite kind. Simply that to you, anyone who offers a view different from your own, is a host to any one of a number of disorders, defects, intolerable indoctrinations etc It's interesting to note that Femme-Nazis, Homosexuophiles, racist racial minorities & the remainder of the leftist losers also make continual practice of such delusional tactics Funny, how "humanism" leads to apehood. Devolution?
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 09:57:08
than the other 9 teams' deficient dirtifyer's, much the same way in which I do on evolutionists all over YouTube. Except you guys are already as dirty as can be, with a rap sheet of fraudulence longer than it takes a virus to morph into an elephant. Just think, viruses being a single cell, have evoistically been around since when only they existed. All that time they've been mutating like a Mo-Fo as they do now. Yet, they're still stuck on virus just like you guys are stuck on "stupid"!
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 09:55:50
ten & when 1 performs better than the others, it does so because that's the one they designed the best. Notice its form didn't come by way of mutation nor did its environment change The Anti-Detergent, Dirt Dispenser Co. had an outdated design with their dirt dispenser contraption. They hired 10 teams of R&D people. Each team would be starting from the platform of the current outdated design with the intent to improve it. One team designed a Dirt Proliferator that kicked ass on detergent better
By: Chuichupachichi. on 08 Sep 09, 09:54:25
You have to be joking. You actually have the audacity to throw the word stupid my way? Are you truly that blind? This whole farce is claiming to be proof of natural selection's validity. There isn't 1 thing natural about this whole process. They start with a nozzle that men designed - that involves intelligence. They make 10 copies & modify each one of them - that involves intelligence & there's nothing random about it since men determined exactly what those modifications would be. They test all
By: ArgusEyes. on 07 Sep 09, 03:06:53
"McDonald's patty flipper" would not suffice for this kind of work. I have done this kind of work and you haven't you are simply wrong, I told you before that it requires intelligence to create these kinds of natural selections scenarios but you either didn't read it are ignoring it. This all seems to be the basis for some kind of emotional and luddite-ish argument that this will put engineers out of a job or some such thing. That has not impact on its efficacy as a method or evolution.
By: ArgusEyes. on 07 Sep 09, 02:21:20
circumstances they would be deficient. Your zeal to spit on evolution or anything that looks like it is making you say some pretty stupid things.
By: ArgusEyes. on 07 Sep 09, 02:21:09
They weren't "deficient" at designing because they didn't come up with the more efficient design themselves. A computer can solve sums more quickly than I can but it does not mean I am "deficient" at sums. Because I am a human not a computer. Also, this company is a leading company and no other company had the more efficient nozzle, they discovered it. If the designers were floundering when all other soap companies had far more efficient designs then I would say that under those (cont)